Achiever2015

From the thread starter, this investment program started since 18th Feb, and I believe it must be paying before this could be posted here. However, the ROI as tabled here in plan 1 is sustainable but the long duration before BEP is reach would make investors reluctant. Plan 2 and 3 are unlikely to receive patronage because of the high minimum deposits.

Yeah, that is true. The one 'waiting' monitor rating does mean little compared to above 20 monitors rating the program as paying. Having completed the first round showed the admin's commitment. But the latest rating showed their may be an impending danger with this program as some monitors are rating it as 'problem'. http://www.allhyipmonitors.com/details/gsa-onlineinvestments.com?final=1

I just checked the monitor ratings for this hyip now and found that the status rating could be a signal of an end to this program. The ratings have 'paying', 'waiting' and 'problem'. This is not really good. http://www.allhyipmonitors.com/details/hurricane-assets.com?final=1

This program, just as the thread starter has noted, is really paying. Monitors added to its radar as listed on AHM are rating it as paying and a very few as waiting. I just it keeps paying investors. http://www.allhyipmonitors.com/details/pacificinvest.net?final=1

When a hyip like this is paying and we have credible monitors on its radar rating it as such, investors' confidence is raised. I hope the admin continues to pay his investors. The hyip is still paying: http://www.allhyipmonitors.com/details/bestgainfx.com?final=1

This program's rate on investment at 14% daily is really on the high side, and do not think it's sustainable. Though the $1 minimus deposit affords an investor opportunity to minimize his exposure to risk.

This program's rate on investment at 14% daily is really on the high side, and do not think it's sustainable. Though the $1 minimus deposit affords an investor opportunity to minimize his exposure to risk.

This program's rate on investment at 14% daily is really on the high side, and do not think it's sustainable. Though the $1 minimus deposit affords an investor opportunity to minimize his exposure to risk.

Quite true that the scripting and template is not more than ordinary, the ROI offered here is also not realistic and I don't think it is sustainable. But at this stage, hit-and-run may be the approach since the program is still young.

Truly, I do not understand the workability of hyips in its entirety. Some programs you'll expect to flop in matters of hours end up staying longer than thought, and vice versa. This program is one of such. Running and Paying for over 2weeks with this outrageous ROI! http://www.allhyipmonitors.com/details/great-payment.com?final=1

Truly we have a really sustainable plan here as tabled by the admin. And the minimum deposit is also a good one. This program is also having a 'paying' and 'waiting' rating status among the monitors. http://www.allhyipmonitors.com/details/futureinvest.biz?final=1

I really do not get what this investment firm does or stand to offer. There is no adequate supply of information provided here. Is tk really not a free hosting hosting site? On AHM, though, monitors are listing it as paying and waiting: http://www.allhyipmonitors.com/details/trade-liberty.tk?final=1

In less than 6 days this program has turned SCAM! This is unbelievable, considering the fact that the first plan, thoug high, is sustainable. It has turned scam! http://www.allhyipmonitors.com/details/schorecapital.com?final=1

In less than 6 days this program has turned SCAM! This is unbelievable, considering the fact that the first plan, thoug high, is sustainable. It has turned scam! http://www.allhyipmonitors.com/details/schorecapital.com?final=1

The ROIs tabled in plan 1 are quite sustainable provided the admin is committed to ensuring that investment proceeds and deposits are properly managed. The factor that investors should consider is the 120 days factor. Monitors are rating as 'paying'. http://www.allhyipmonitors.com/details/billion-folds.com?final=1

The first two plans in this hyip are really sustainable. The first plan would have greater patronage due to the $1 minimum deposit offering a minimal investment risk. Also the 30days duration of the program is another factor to consider. The hyip is still paying. http://www.allhyipmonitors.com/details/ric-finance.com?final=1

Hit-and-run might work because of the fact that it's still a new program. However, I think the first plan under plan A is sustainable at 5% daily (though on the high side) because of its $10 minimum deposit i.e this plan has the lowest risk. http://www.allhyipmonitors.com/details/interest888.com?final=1

This is really a sustainable program, going by the ROI the admin has tabled here for investors, and the leverage to deposit any amount of money i.e there's no minimum or maximum deposits. However, contrary to the opinion above, this hyip has over 15 monitors on its radar, and more than 90% are rating as paying. http://www.allhyipmonitors.com/details/money-box.net?final=1

I quite agree that the admin does determine how many monitors are added to monitor the investment program. However, with many credible monitors, would-be investors are confident to invest. But so far so good, this hyip is still paying. http://www.allhyipmonitors.com/details/share4wealth.com?final=1

I quite agree that the admin does determine how many monitors are added to monitor the investment program. However, with many credible monitors, would-be investors are confident to invest. But so far so good, this hyip is still paying. http://www.allhyipmonitors.com/details/share4wealth.com?final=1

The several monitors on its radar as listed on AHM are all rating this hyip as paying with just a few rating it as waiting. I hope the admin continues to pay in this investment program. http://www.allhyipmonitors.com/details/gsa-onlineinvestments.com?final=1

Though the admin here has tabled a sustainable ROI, the plan of weekly profit is not beneficial to investors. I think this program is designed to suit or benefit the admin more than the investors, this is because the minimum deposit here at $50 and at 5% ROI is not beneficial to investors. This hyip will receive low patronage.

Though the admin here has tabled a sustainable ROI, the plan of weekly profit is not beneficial to investors. I think this program is designed to suit or benefit the admin more than the investors, this is because the minimum deposit here at $50 and at 5% ROI is not beneficial to investors. This hyip will receive low patronage.

Good point there, budado! We really must ascertain if a program would last another round having almost completed or completed its round. If from our analysed indices, the answer is no, then we'd better not invest there. But this program has done well so far.

Good point there, budado! We really must ascertain if a program would last another round having almost completed or completed its round. If from our analysed indices, the answer is no, then we'd better not invest there. But this program has done well so far.