Jump to content

Exchange Blog Cryptocurrency Blog


All Pips



pinay

Member
  • Posts

    989
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by pinay

  1. Can't see the amount of ads that they have, but looking at their payment proof section it seems to be very up-to-date - yet I find it a bit weird that if $2 was their minimum PO, why'd there be two over $6 requests, as it clearly indicates that many have easily reached the $2 already? Decent rates with nice selection of payment processors available, but they do lack anything to attract new members: no complimentary PB or membership upgrade or anything upon joining. This with the fact that guests cannot see how much they have ads available daily, makes me not interested to join.
  2. This made me giggle the first time "bad idea to pay in euros", but it's starting to get a bit too repetitive now. Earning in euros is much better than earning in USD, why don't you get that? But as this site is part of the "legit bux network", I'm not really a fan of them. The admin is arrogant brat, and their TOS (at least on their other sites) are very bad. Also they take out "fees" over the top from free members. I'm only a member since I got ref exchange, I don't expect getting a single cent out of this "scam".
  3. What I meant by "adjusting our payments", was that if the members we're able to leave multiple payout requests at the same time, getting the actual payment two weeks later wouldn't be an issue, since we could time out PO requests in a way that we'd be getting e.g., $3 weekly. Now we get bigger lump sums only every now and then (which does in the end work out to the same amount, but is still a bit uncertain) instead of getting steady stream.
  4. Of course! With forum such as this where earning e.g., 300 points is not that hard and really not a long term project, then why settle for 150? I guess going for weekly payouts of, say that 300, is very reasonable goal that doesn't require too much work at all. Maybe even 400-500 weekly would be reachable without making your fingers bleed
  5. Extremely attractive rates, and very low membership fees make this one a site that should be kept an eye on. But I cannot see the $.02 rates in the posted image, so maybe they have even more memberships available? Nice startup promotions and competitions, although if they pay $300 for three members who get 300 refs, they need to have some serious funds up their sleeve for this project. I guess I'm giving it few days to see if payment proofs start to pop up on forums, and then join. As this is very attractive one, I really do hope that they succeed and will stay for long.
  6. Their rates are very low, quite useless even, but their minimum PO is very high. Given that the site is very new, and the admin is apparently new to the PTC scene, these both will hopefully be fixed to better reflect the industry standards soon. It's also nice to see that they have some credibility behind them from the MaximGen Production, although it amazes me how someone who apparently makes their living off of websites/designing has not much that much effort into their own site (this PTC I mean). One would think that they'd whip up even some temporary design in few hours if they're going to up the site online.
  7. They do have very attractive rates and low minimum PO, this accompanied with nice daily earnings already (it is very new site) would make this a nice one to give a spin. However, their choice of selecting registered trademark of Maybach for their business' name as well as their domain is not smart move. It doesn't require much from from Maybach (given that the news reach them) to give a call or send DMCA notice to BuxHost, and this site will be shut down. We've already seen similar incidents in the past, so we know that BuxHost is not risking any lawsuits. If they had used some non-trademarked name/domain, I would've joined and given them a chance, but now I feel it's too risky to go for it.
  8. $5 as the minimum PO for free members is indeed quite high, but then again so is the daily earning going over $0.3. But having only PP as PO method is not very good, they should add at least AP and LR as well to be able to attract more users. And hiding the site statistics indeed gives a very suspicious impression of this one - maybe they're not paying at all? Also the site design is very bad, even hurts the eyes with tis neon lime green - I don't like it. Seem as the admin has not put much effort into it, and the little he did, he just messed up. I'd appreciate even the plain buxhost template more than this current one. Hopefully he fixes it during the upcoming days.
  9. Not cheap? I guess you don't have a slightest clue about the pricing of Zeus then? Basic Zeus v2.2 is only $39.99 annually per domain, whereas BuxHost is $25/mo (on monthly payment plan, goes as low as $10). Even Xeocoder's nTen is only $130 annually - so I wouldn't say that this is exactly expensive script... But at least they use legit one, instead of nulled - multiple of those around, due to the low security of the script.
  10. No fees for cheques in US? Well, no wonder they stick with such bad method then. But for ROW it makes no sense at all to use the cheques for their very high fees, and even if those were to be removed completely, cheques are still way too slow method of moving money around. Wire transfer (which is also a bit so-so) only takes couple of days to basically any corner of world, so that'd be better.
  11. It's going to take few days from PP -> bank, even after PP shows the transaction as completed. In worst case, it may even take a week (talking about 7 business days, so weven longer if there's weekend inbetween). I don't do that much PP to bank transfers anymore, since my main "bank" account is with Payoneer, and there's no way to get money from PayPal to there very easily. Their US virtual account would allow sending funds from PP, but I'm not sure if my transfers on a yearly basis would justify the $20/y account fee.
  12. I find it hard to believe that LR would be "stealing your funds". That'd be a killing blow for their business. And no dispute/chargeback just means that you need to be absolutely sure about how and where you want to send your money, and only use LR with the mentality that every transaction you do, ir irreversible and you have the chance to never make that money back (e.g., sending funds to hyip or other investment program).
  13. The ROI is indeed very unsustainable, but a single glance at the site gives the impression that this one was only created to scam people. It's so unprofessional with no SSL or DDOS protection whatsoever, that there's just no way a person could build up enough trust in this. I cannot see any monitors listed on their site, and maybe that is because they don't want scam to be written any more clearly over their site, lol.
  14. They do have ROI that leans towards unsustainable, but so far I can see two monitors already confirming them as paying, with multiple in waiting status. Nice to see just $1 minimum investment in the daily plan, so it's easy even for newbies to get into the game and have their first experiences with hyip without the fear of going bankrupt right off the bat.
  15. I'm also getting the following message from Chrome: While this doesn't exactly mean that the SSL is fake, it's at least not recognized valid as 99.9% of the usually are. Proceed with caution. FXInv is a brand new site, and theyr short term plan has very high ROI. Long term plans have more sustainable ROI, but I wonder if the company is legit with all the issues presented. Although there are three monitors showing them as paying, the rest are still in waiting - so maybe we shall wait a bit and see, no?
  16. Some monitor lists them as paying, while other waiting - kinda confusing. Maybe they're doing somewhat selective payments? If that's the case, then their credibility is very non-existant. However, their rates are reasonable, and the ROI sustainable looking. With the industry standard $10 minimum investment, there's not that much at stake if trying them out for the 5 day term.
  17. Their long term plan looks very sustainable, but then on the other hand their 48/72 hours plans have very high ROI and are very dangerous looking choices. But as stated before, their rating page doesn't work, and that is a little off putting at least for me. But if the monitors have listed this one as waiting off-site, then it could be better to go with some other hyip with more reasonable ROI for the short term plans.
  18. Been running since last April? That's nice! But as they have very sustainable ROI, it's not exactly a wonder that they've pulled this one off. They have multiple monitors all rating them as paying, and with plans starting as low as $1 it's quite easy to go and trust them with some pocket money and see it grow a bit.
  19. Oh man this site is wacky. At least the PTC section is full of people digging up old threads and spamming their template message with rates grabbed from OP - there's no way one could find any real information there. I guess I cannot benefit from that very much, and need to stick in MLM and HYIP sections, seems to be a bit more intelligent in there.
  20. W all know that hourly HYIPs are plain scam, but this takes it one level deeper and goes to only 30 minute plans. Too high ROI to be sustainable, so there's not even a point to invest for one round in here - too unrealistic, so one is basically guaranteed to lose their funds right off the bat.
  21. Quite high initial investment deposit (when compared to the "standard" $10) compared with the fact that they're missing SSL is a bit unsettling. Very high ROI on their plans means very high risk, but it seems that they've returned over $20k to members already. Yet, no monitors has taken this one up yet.
  22. Their rates are quite downlow indeed, with free members earning only $0.02 daily, and upgraded earning $0.086. Even with the lowest $2 minimum PO that's not attractive at all. And given that they haven't run (any public) competitions or promotions on the site, it's very weird to see that they do indeed have over 4000 registered members. I really can't see any reason to join this site, but apparently their advertising campaign(s) have been huge success.
  23. Don't really have answer to that. Maybe the admin is located in Europe, and dealing with EUR is more familiar to him that USD. But earning in EUR is actually better, since EUR is currently 1,32 USD. And their minimum PO is just €1, not €10 as stated in the OP. This is very reasonable PO minimum. However, their rates are utter garbage, and even the most upgraded "V.I.P." members can earn €0.0024 daily - this makes no sense at all! The admin is looking to get very big cut when he offers €1/1000 clicks, yet only pays €0.0002 per click. This site is not worth anyones time - unless the admin notices that the lack of members springs from the fact of extremely bad click rate, and goes to bump it up a lot.
  24. No, not really. You see, they only have four ads, so one can earn $0.04 a day, and with such useless ref click rate there's not much use of refs. So it's going to take 100 days for anyone to even reach the PO minimum. No effort put into this site, and there's completely nothing that would encourage joining in. Wonder why someone who invests money into putting up this kind of business won't to anything with it...
  25. No effort at all put into this site - no wonder it hasn't reached any popularity. Although I must say their idea of incorporating PTC with some sort or shareholding is an interesting one, but when they only give out "corporate BS" written as wall of text on caps, it gives no credibility at all to them. But as stated before, there is no effort at all put into this site in one week, so it most likely will not move forward at all. Someone actually utilizing multiple sources of income where they could afford to take shareholders in would have taken action on their site long ago - this one didn't. Don't bother with this.
×
×
  • Create New...